Comparison
A subscription based lead generation service that matches clients to attorneys.
Overview
LegalMatch launched in 1999 with a matching model rather than a directory model. Consumers describe their legal issue through a structured intake form, and LegalMatch routes that inquiry to attorneys in the relevant practice area and geography who subscribe to receive those leads.
For attorneys, the product is essentially a subscription to a stream of intake forms. There is a public profile, but the profile is secondary to the intake flow. Pricing is quoted by sales representatives and can run several hundred to a few thousand dollars per month depending on the market and category.
Reviews of LegalMatch from the attorney side are mixed. Some subscribers report a steady flow of usable leads. Others report that the same case is often sent to multiple attorneys simultaneously and that lead quality varies widely.
Independent, privately held.
New to Lexoor? Read the Lexoor story, search 743,000+ attorneys, or claim your own profile in under two minutes.
Feature comparison
Honest breakdown
Structured intake forms
Clients describe their issue in detail before an attorney receives the lead, which can improve fit.
Direct lead flow
Leads arrive in the attorney's inbox rather than requiring the attorney to browse a public directory.
Focused product
Everything the platform does is oriented around generating and routing leads.
Not a true directory
Consumers cannot easily browse or compare attorneys the way they can on Lexoor, Avvo, or FindLaw.
Shared leads
The same intake is often sent to multiple attorneys in the same market, which turns follow up into a speed contest.
Opaque pricing and long contracts
Pricing is quoted individually and typically involves annual contracts.
Limited profile visibility
Attorneys effectively pay for lead flow rather than for building a public presence.
Pricing
LegalMatch subscriptions are quoted individually. Reported prices generally range from three hundred to two thousand dollars per month depending on practice area, geography, and lead volume commitments.
Lexoor keeps pricing transparent. The free tier includes a full profile, lead inbox, analytics, and messaging. Paid promotion is offered as a simple monthly plan with no annual contracts and no per lead surcharges.
The recommendation
Choose Lexoor
Choose Lexoor if you want a public presence that also generates leads, if you want clients to choose you specifically, and if you prefer transparent monthly pricing without long contracts.
Choose LegalMatch
Choose LegalMatch if you want a pure lead subscription and you are comfortable competing against other subscribers on speed and follow up for shared intakes.
Verdict
LegalMatch and Lexoor are different products for different marketing strategies. LegalMatch is a lead subscription. Lexoor is a real online home for your practice that also drives leads.
Frequently asked
Attorney reports are mixed. Some subscribers see steady returns, others feel the shared lead model dilutes value.
Yes, and many attorneys do, treating LegalMatch as a lead channel and Lexoor as their public profile.
Still deciding? Compare Lexoor vs Avvo, Lexoor vs FindLaw, or Lexoor vs Justia.
743,000+ attorneys are already listed across all 50 states. Claim your profile in under two minutes.
Keep comparing
Lexoor vs
Avvo
The original attorney rating site. Broad reach, controversial 1 to 10 score, and an aging user experience.
ReadLexoor vs
FindLaw
One of the oldest legal properties on the web. Strong on content, weaker on the attorney directory experience.
ReadLexoor vs
Justia
A respected free legal library with a functional but basic attorney directory.
Read